Saturday 3 March 2012

Multiculturalism, Racism, Genocide

Up Pompeii picks up on an article in the Mail which states that a surge in babies born to immigrant parents has moved Britain from having one of Europe's most rapidly ageing populations to one of the youngest, according to official figures. It is perhaps worth reproducing UP Pompeii's post in full:
"The population replacement of the UK is almost complete, the demographics are now becoming a reality, by the year 2035 the elderly population of the UK will be the lowest in Europe, the host population being replaced by young children of migrant origin, the English race is doomed, inside two generations from now it will probably not exist.

This damage has been brought about over the past ten years, yes the Nu Labour years, the Blair years, needless to say the article concentrates on the Eastern European influx into the UK and completely ignores the 5-6 million from Pakistan, Bangladesh, North Africa and sub Saharan Africa, this is another example of information manipulation by the media.

The Government must have known about this prior to it publication and I would argue that they must have known for some time. this sheds light on why so little is done about the concerns of the indigenous populations concerns regarding immigration.

Our views, the indigenous populations views do not matter, we are destined to be a small minority in this land and eventually extinct.

The social engineers have won, they have created a population that will destroy the English, this was and still is their intent.

What right have they, the politicians to do this to my country and the people of England, they are truly traitors of immense proportions, they are more dangerous than any other traitor past and present and completely evil.

If you are white, English and educated your days are numbered in the UK, your gene pool has been consigned to the rubbish bin.

Of course all of this is presented as a positive for this country - it is not, the politicians have succeeded in doing what no other has done they have destroyed England, the Romans did not do it neither did William the conqueror.

The next time you are ignored by a shop assistant or petty official or your MP you now know why, we are in the process of being discarded and thus not worthy of any attention - have you ever wondered why our elderly are treated so badly, they are the remnants of a murdered race of an ongoing genocide orchestrated by our own governments
"
Readers will no doubt recall the explosive accusation made by Andrew Neather in 2009 when he alleged that the increase in immigration during the Blair years was a deliberate policy to make this country more multicultural.


From Wikipedia we learn that genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group"  While a precise definition varies amongs genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group children of the group to another group.". It can simply also be known as the intent to destroy a group, in part or in whole.


Some may say that the post by Up Pompeii is over the top, historically incorrect, even racist; however what cannot be denied is that our country is being changed through immigration. It is also true that the birth rates among immigrants are far higher than that experienced among, dare one say, white British is illustrated by this article in the Mail, one which states that at Ealing Hospital, in 2010, of the 3,289 children delivered, an extraordinary 2,655 babies were born to non-British mothers; that statistics also showed the maternity unit last year dealt with women from a total of 104 different nationalities; and that as a result, a team of translators, funded by the taxpayer, had to be on hand around the clock.


Whilst, as Wiki says, the crime of genocide has to have intent proven, where the ethnic rape of our country is concerned I'm with Up Pompeii in that I too believe the white British in their own country are the subject of ongoing genocide orchestrated by their own politicians. It doesn't take a degree in maths to realise that with the birth rate among immigrants being greater than the white British, it won't be long before the white British will be a minority in their own land.


It is worth noting that in this social engineering of our country, as with so much else to which we have been subjected, you were not asked if you agreed with it.


And you still wish to live under our system of democratised dictatorship?


Just asking...................


8 comments:

TomTom said...

It is peculiar how the Anglo-Americans destroyed themselves post-1945...really quite strange....as if to prove their former adversaries had a point

PeterCharles said...

As TT obliquely points out it is not just the UK suffering this kind of deliberate homogenisation, it is happening all over the developed world. I think the answer is simple, it's part of the social democratic consensus that wishes to see One World Government and the elimination of nationhood. This is just one of the secret methods, secret because no one would ever dare admit to it, at best they could expect political extinction, at worst they are likely to be lynched.

I doesn't even have to be the case that politicians implementing these measures know what they are doing, 'useful idiots' are, after all, the most ubiquitous of politicians' characteristics.

On a different tack, the situation is not like to be as dire as suggested. The majority of immigration is confined to major cities, which could well make the situation worse as instead of a racial elimination we would have politically disenfranchised English majority throughout rural England ruled by the New English of the cities, a situation that could well lead to the Balkanisation of our country. There is also the point that many of those immigrants may well leave when our economic collapse comes, and there is some cheer in the statistics that family size among immigrants quickly declines to national norms with succeeding generations, somewhat delaying the apocalypse if immigration levels are ever brought under control.

john in cheshire said...

WfW, I agree entirely with what you are reporting. I have to say that the BNP have been making this same argument for many years, only to be derided for being 'far-rightwing'. But regardless of how they are regarded as a political party, their assessment is correct. As is Up Pompeii's; as is yours.
And that it is so widespread in the civilised Western world (or we were brought up to believe we lived in a civilised Western world) that it cannot be accidental or a coincidence.
I keep waiting for the fightback to begin. I'm probably too old now to be of much use in the fighting parts, but I'd gladly support any movement that turned on those who are doing this to us.
And, if I had the power, I'd be quite brutal in my solution to the whole problem.

Woodsy42 said...

I think it's deliberata. But not especially to create multiculturalism - that's just a useful by-product. The aim, in my opinion, was to cover for the bad planning and thefts of our savings via tax and inflation that means the country cannout support the ageing population.

Katabasis said...

"I think the answer is simple, it's part of the social democratic consensus that wishes to see One World Government and the elimination of nationhood"

I think that is spot on Peter. Our overlords in the EUSSR have certainly made no secretly of openly stating their fervent wish for the end of the nation state.

Even as someone who leans towards the more anarchist end of the libertarian spectrum I must say - may they burn in hell for this.

Thomas G said...

I'd have thought that all that matters is how the nation recovers.

And there seem to be only two options. Either the mass immigration is assimilated (as it arguably has been in the US). Or those elements of the mass immigration that will not assimilate are removed.

The departure of the current evil and/or incompetent oligarchy is a necessary precondition for both options.

Sounds a bit BNP-ish, but there you are.

WitteringsfromWitney said...

TT: Odd that, isn't it?

PC: Agree on the OWG - I would question your last points about immigrant numbers decreasing though.

jic: Thank you. BNP's problem was they went about it the wrong way. PC's point about OWG is important. As to the fightback - I can eventually see a race war, combined with a politics war.

W42: Interesting theory.

K: Fair point re the EU. I'm slightly more to the centre than you but I agree with you about hell!

TG: Nowt wrong with your reasoning!

john in cheshire said...

W42, I'd suggest that if we hadn't aborted something like 200,000 babies each year for the past few decades, we'd have sufficient young indignenous people to take up the struggle for us as we grow older. Instead we have allowed our own to be killed while we have imported lower quality bodies to replace them. Now, you tell me where's the logic in that?